<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Seesmic (Twitter app) for Android</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartphoneblogging.com/2009/11/review-seesmic-twitter-app-for-android/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartphoneblogging.com/2009/11/review-seesmic-twitter-app-for-android/</link>
	<description>In-depth hardware and software reviews for smartphones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Swift (Twitter app) for Android &#124; Smartphone Blogging</title>
		<link>http://smartphoneblogging.com/2009/11/review-seesmic-twitter-app-for-android/comment-page-1/#comment-2835</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Swift (Twitter app) for Android &#124; Smartphone Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartphoneblogging.com/?p=1789#comment-2835</guid>
		<description>[...] is also very fluid without any hiccups. I have tried out many other Twitter clients (currently Seesmic), but none of them can compete with the speed Swift provides. By touching the icons at the top you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is also very fluid without any hiccups. I have tried out many other Twitter clients (currently Seesmic), but none of them can compete with the speed Swift provides. By touching the icons at the top you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahpur Azizpour</title>
		<link>http://smartphoneblogging.com/2009/11/review-seesmic-twitter-app-for-android/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahpur Azizpour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartphoneblogging.com/?p=1789#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>I started out for my review using Seesmic 1.0, and played around with the new version for a day. As you already said, the new version is a little bit better, but for me the updates are the most important part of a twitter client, and Swift is still the fastest in this regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started out for my review using Seesmic 1.0, and played around with the new version for a day. As you already said, the new version is a little bit better, but for me the updates are the most important part of a twitter client, and Swift is still the fastest in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nodch</title>
		<link>http://smartphoneblogging.com/2009/11/review-seesmic-twitter-app-for-android/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>nodch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartphoneblogging.com/?p=1789#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>Nice review. Did you test the updated version of Seesmic oder the 1.0? As far as the perfomance issues go, they are almost completely solved in the new version, although still not compareable to Swift.
A nice introduction on Android devices: Seesmic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. Did you test the updated version of Seesmic oder the 1.0? As far as the perfomance issues go, they are almost completely solved in the new version, although still not compareable to Swift.<br />
A nice introduction on Android devices: Seesmic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
